|
News
The Voinovich EPA Bill
Aired April 11, 2000
Ohio Senator George Voinovich says when it comes to enforcing
the Clean Air Act, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is too cavalier
with taxpayer dollars. Voinovich has introduced a bill in Washington that would
force the EPA to do a cost-benefit analysis before it imposes new air regulations.
Conservation groups say his bill is an attempt to take the teeth out of a landmark
environmental law. 90.3's Ley Garnett reports.
Ley GarnettOhio's junior Republican Senator George
Voinovich is sponsoring a major revision to the Clean Air Act. He calls it the
"Air Quality Standard Improvement Act of 2000." His co-author is Louisiana Democrat
John Breaux. The fact that these two Senators are behind the bill is no surprise.
Breaux represents a state which has the highest concentration of chemical plants
in the country. Ohio is a heavily industrial state, a fact that Voinovich says
should carry more weight with the Environmental Protection Agency
George VoinovichAnd they should recognize one other
thing: Ohio is a manufacturing state. We're not Wyoming. We're not some of these
other states where you don't have manufacturing. And if you take in consideration
the number of industries that we have and look at what we've been able to accomplish,
we have made significant strides.
LGBut the U.S. EPA thinks more strides are needed
from Ohio. It blames Midwestern and Southern states for much of the smog problem
on the East coast and wants Ohio industries to cut smokestack emissions of nitrogen
oxide by 85%. Ohio has proposed a 65% reduction and has sued the federal government
over the higher standard. Voinovich admits that Ohio's long running legal fight
with the U.S. EPA over air standards is one reason he drafted this legislation.
GVSpecifically in terms of these new standards for ozone and
particulate matter, Ohio, along with many other states filed a lawsuit against the EPA and
said that they hadn't done the job, they were supposed to do and the Court of Appeals ruled
that they hadn't done the research work necessary prior to the issuance of these rules, and
now the Supreme Court of the United States is going to be considering that case.
LGActually the Senator's interpretation of the Appeals Court ruling
is incorrect. The Appeals Court overturned a lower court that had temporarily blocked the new
regulations. As it stands today the EPA does have authority to impose the tougher air
standards, but Ohio is expected to join several other states in pressing the case to the
U.S. Supreme Court.
Do you think that there's an East Coast bias with the national EPA?
GVI think that, uh, that, that that they're allies.
(laughs)
LGThe U.S. EPA has no official comment on Voinovich's
legislation. However a high ranking EPA official told 90.3 WCPN® that his agency already
takes cost into consideration. The official said the agency, in fact, is under
an executive order from President Clinton to do cost-benefit analyses for any
regulation that would cost 100 million dollars or more to implement. He said
that on three different occasions, Congress has specifically directed the EPA
to NOT take cost into consideration when setting clean air standards. Though
the EPA is silent on the Voinovich bill, environmental groups are raging.
Shari WeirWhat he's trying to do is put more obstacles
in the road on the path to clean air.
LGShari Weir is with Ohio Citizen Action.
SWThe reality is that the EPA already has very
stringent guidelines it has to follow before it puts into effect any new clear
air regulations. Senator Voinovich has a long history of opposing every initiative
that has come along to try to clean up our air.
LGNational environmental groups are even stronger
in their denunciation. Frank O'Donnell is executive director of Clean Air Trust
in Washington.
Frank O'DonnellIt would paralyze the EPA when
it comes to setting health standards. It would give the polluters the right
to go to court to challenge anything the EPA did, any of the EPA's cost estimates,
which would again tie them up in knots.
LGO' Donnell's organization has given Senator
Voinovich a dubious award for introducing the bill. It has made him its "Clean
Air Villain" of the month. This being a Presidential election year, the bill
is expected to become even more of a national political issue as the voting
draws near and Congress considers reauthorizing the Clean Air Act next year.
In Cleveland, I'm Ley Garnett, 90.3 WCPN®, 90.3 FM.
|