|
News
Holding School Accountable
Aired June 6, 2001
If school funding is the top education issue on Ohio's
agenda, then school accountability surely runs a close second. It's is
one tier of a national school reform movement that's grown and matured
over the last decade, and it will be the focus later today of a roundtable
forum to be broadcast on 90.3 WCPN®. There's much disagreement over accountability
standards, and just how accountable schools can and should be held for
teaching kids to read, write, do math, and think critically. 90.3's Bill
Rice reports.
Bill RiceStudents at Maple Elementary School
in North Olmstead are ready for summer. Just two more days to go, and
then three months of freedom from pencils and books, school lunches and
report cards. Maple Principle Kenneth Towne says it's been a good year.
Kenneth TowneI'm very satisfied with the
efforts we've made at the school this year in terms of the kids and their
progress. Our mission at our school is to create success for every kid
ito teamwork and a positive focus, and I think we've kept that mission
in terms of positive focus and teamwork.
BRThat feeling of satisfaction is tempered
just a bit by results of this year's proficiency tests, which are cause
for concern. His school's fourth grade reading scores were down this year
by 17%. Towne says the tests are a big deal these days in Ohio's schools.
KTI will say this, that it permeates everything
I do anymore compared to, say, ten years ago. Everything we do in school
now revolves around proficiencies.
BRLike many educators, Towne believes schools
should be held accountable for how well they educate kids. So does Douglas
Clay, Director of Accountability and Assessment at Cleveland State University's
Center for Urban School Collaboration. Clay says school accountability
is an old concept, but in the last decade has embraced a new paradigm:
schools must now demonstrate they're actually teaching kids. And proficiency
tests, he says, to some degree do that.
Douglas ClayStatewide testing around the
country, and now the call for national testing, allows us to start comparing
school districts. And now there's this big push to make sure kids are
actually learning. The argument 'Well, I taught it but they didn't learn
it" doesn't fly anymore.
BRToday so-called "high stakes tests" are
a central fact of educational life. Like Towne, Clay supports testing.
But some aren't so generous in tying tests to accountability. Gloria Ladson
Billings is a noted author and education professor at the University of
Wisconsin.
Gloria Ladson BillingsThe problem I have
with accountability in schooling is the burden for that accountability
is falling on the weakest links.
BRThose weak links, Billings says, are teachers
and students, both of whom, in many struggling districts, often find it
impossible to rise above very difficult circumstances. Many teachers often
they don't have up-to-date textbooks, computers or science labs.
But perhaps the heaviest burden, Billings says, falls
on the students, especially those who's life circumstances, in effect,
deny them the opportunity to learn.
GLBWhen we came out with these standards
what we said we were going to do is that one set of standards would be
an "opportunity to learn" standard. And that kids could not be held accountable
for all these other standards if the opportunity-to-learn standard is
not in place.
BRBillings says such is the case at many
schools throughout Ohio.
But even among those who approve of testing as a measure
of school success, there is dissatisfaction with Ohio's testing system.
Cleveland State's Douglas Clay says Ohio wasn't particularly smart when
it put together a plan to monitor schools' progress.
DCOhio did this backwards. Ohio jumped on
the bandwagon and came up with tests, and teachers are saying this test
doesn't match what I'm teaching. That's because there wasn't a standard
they could see. Every school district in Ohio had it's own curriculum,
largely based on whatever textbook they chose.
BROhio should have worked to establish standards
first, Clay says, implement them in the classrooms, and then develop the
tests to measure how well those standards are met. That's what's happening
now in the state legislature, he says. Senate Bill 1, which is still being
debated, attempts to address many of the concerns about proficiencies
that have come to light. And lawmakers have already rescinded a requirement
to hold kids back who fail the reading test, a move that's especially
gratifying to Maple Elementary Principle Kenneth Towne.
KTIf we were looking at what we'd have to
retain we'd be retaining 40% of our kids. In Cleveland they'd have to
retain 80% or 70%. It's logistically, educationally, socially a very unsound
decision that anybody would ever make.
BRThat rule would have taken effect with
this year's fourth graders. As is stands, most will move on to fifth grade,
and can breathe easy as they leave their school worries behind for the
summer. In Cleveland, Bill Rice, 90.3 WCPN® News.
Suggested Websites
Association of American Educators - Survey on Rules, Regulations
and Mandates Show Teachers are at the Breaking Point:
Buckeye Institute - Proficiency Tests and the Blame Game:
Thomas B. Fordham Foundation:
|
|