|
News
Brook Park IX Center Vote Set
Aired August 3, 2001
Brook Park residents will vote next week
on a controversial land swap deal penned by Mayors Mike White and Tom
Coyne. If it's approved, the IX Center settlement would end a legal battle
between the two cities that started nearly 11 years ago, costing both
sides at least $11 million. The plan would allow Cleveland to construct
a new runway at Hopkins International Airport by 2016. Brook Park voters
have been lobbied by campaign committees with different agendas, but it's
unclear which side is winning. Some are calling Brook Park's Issue 1 too
close to call. 90.3 WCPN®'s Janet Babin reports.
Janet BabinThe two mayors finalized the land-swap
deal in March. Under the agreement, about 135 acres - including the IX
Center and other development parcels in Brook Park - would move into Cleveland's
boundaries to be used for airport expansion. In return, Brook Park would
get the portions of NASA property that are now in Cleveland, currently
worth about $2 million in tax revenue annually. Brook Park is also guaranteed
that the IX Center will continue to operate for the next ten years, providing
about $6 million in taxes before it's torn down to make way for the new
runway.
Cleveland
would also obtain early eminent domain rights and a long term option to
purchase 468 Brook Park homes over seven years. Cleveland's City Council
approved the agreement, but Brook Park City Council voted to let residents
decide.
Brook Park councilman Russell Horner voted against putting
the issue on the ballot. Horner heads a council committee that's studying
the agreement and opposes the deal.
Russell HornerI think the negative impacts
outweigh the benefits.
JBMayor Coyne considers the vote the last
job he has to do in Brook Park. He's announced that he won't seek another
term as mayor. Coyne's working to convince residents to vote in favor
of the plan.
Tom CoyneWe'll recognize an additional $9
million from this deal, but if it's not approved, we won't get NASA, we'll
be left with nothing.
JBIn an ironic twist, Coyne is considering
a run for Mayor of Cleveland. He doesn't think the move conflicts with
the IX Center deal.
TCWell, I don't think it shouldn't affect
anything, if I run for congress or for County Commissioner. If I run for
Mayor of Cleveland with success it would have the best effect. I'd be
enforcing an agreement I made with myself.
JBBrook
Park Councilman Brian Mooney says the mayor's decision to seek office
in Cleveland taints the agreement.
Brian MooneyHe used a former Cleveland City
Council person, negotiated with Cleveland and you're left wondering who's
watching out for Brook Park.
JBMooney outlines what the city will lose
if it votes in favor of Coyne's agreement.
BM$2 million a year to our school district,
property taxes, and 130 parcel that Cleveland has called the most worthwhile
land from here to Chicago.
JBResidents seem just as conflicted about
the deal as the mayor and some council members are. Brook Park resident
Tom Berkner spent 40 years at the airport working for United Airlines.
He says Issue 1 isn't about airport expansion, but about somebody's pockets
getting rich.
Tom BerknerI'm held hostage - I can't sell
my house.
JBResident Gordon Hofman is also having trouble
selling his house, but he says the agreement is the only way anyone will
buy his home.
Gordon HofmanIf anybody thinks they're gonna
get fair market for their home, this seems to be the best thing going.
JBHofman's voting for the plan, but fears
his neighbors will vote against it. Greater Cleveland Growth Association
President Dennis Eckhart has been leading a campaign to make sure residents
approve Issue 1. He defends the Growth Association's right to tell Brook
Park residents how to vote.
Dennis
EckhartWe have and obligation to our members to be a part of
this local debate.
JBThe Growth Association funded the efforts
of The Concerned Brook Park Homeowners for the Future to send out fliers
and take out print ads telling voters that Issue 1 makes sure the city
gets what it's due for the IX Center.
A campaign committee called We the People is counting
not on cash, but on grassroots activism to get out its message. Supporters
of the movement have placed yellow caution tape on their properties. We
the People fliers "tell the growth association to leave Brook Park alone."
If the vote doesn't pass, some residents think Brook Park
will end up in a worse situation. Hofman, along with former City Councilwoman
Bernadene Spina believes the area in question will end up as part of the
airport, no matter how Brook Park residents vote.
Bernadene SpinaCleveland agreed not to challenge
our zoning laws, but then you have the Growth Association or what have
you, anybody can take you to court, and if the fed courts rule that our
zoning ordinances are unreasonable...
GHEminent domain one by one by one....
JBThat scenario would surly mean more litigation
and legal bills for both cities. But councilman Mooney welcomes the challenge.
He says Brook Park deserves nothing less than a share of Hopkins Airport
revenue for bearing the burden of a regional airport owned and operated
by another city. Port Control Director Reuben Sheperd refused to comment
on the agreement for this story. The vote goes down Tuesday, August 7th.
In Cleveland, Janet Babin, 90.3 WCPN® News.
Suggested Websites
City of Brook Park:
U.S. Citizen Aviation Watch:
|
|